Policies of this sort are extremely important for the protection of free thinking and the free exchange of ideas. That said, academic freedom policies are the same policies quashing the free exchange of ideas and promoting whole new highs in academic mediocrity.
What? "Mediocrity" did you say? You heard me right. If you've every sat through one of those gruelling courses led by a hopeless bumbler (poor communicator), borderline sociopath, or walking corpse whose been indefinitely excused from retirement, you can bet that his colleagues (or at least one of them) are well aware of his professional shortcomings. The problem is... You guessed it... Academic freedom policies also protect those professors who couldn't teach their way out of a wet paper bag. Try as you may, oh disenfranchised student, there is nothing you, your TA, or your favorite professor can do to get him out of the classroom.
The problem is that once Professor Cretin has achieved tenure, or just hung around long enough to build-up a heaping helping of seniority, there are few institutions that have any mechanisms in place to root out the bad teachers. Just the contrary, academic freedom policies protect mediocre teachers from persecution for their inability to successfully execute their teaching duties. Chauvinism, inappropriate language, blatant and explicit disregard for students, complete and utter boobery, all of these behaviours are protected by the same policies that were meant to keep Vietnam war protesters from losing their jobs.
So, you might be asking: what can I do about this unfortunate situation? What do I do if I'm stuck in a class where, to draw an example from my own experience, the professor spends more time defending his own alcoholism than he does explaining the course material? The truth is, I'm not really sure. I would start by encouraging you all to be completely and %100 honest when it comes to filling out those little end-of-the-year teaching evaluation surveys that most institutions ask their professors to distribute. The teaching evaluation is no time for being nice especially if the professor doesn't deserve it. Don't say, "the guy was a $h!t He@D," just explain your complaints in as much detail as possible. When you can, offer quotes from the professor him or herself. (Chances are he/she has said the same stupid shit to one or a number of her/his colleagues and they dismissed it thinking, "he'd never really say that in class.")
Along those same lines I would strongly suggest taking advantage of the tools I know you already love and adore--namely, the social media. Use your webcam in class to catch a few exemplary moments in Professor Cretin's classroom. Post them anonymously, of course, but definitely post them. I'm pretty sure that when Professor Cretin goes viral, University of Cretinous Professors will start paying attention and figure out some way to protect the free exchange of ideas AND the quality of your education.
I tend to think (hope?) that there are very few professors who are genuinely deserving of an outright failure. That said, I have met at least a few in my time hanging out on campuses. The fact remains, some professors have to fail. The truth of the matter is, they won't unless you (you are, apparently, the customer after all) force the issue...
There were more typos than in just the first paragraph...
ReplyDeleteIn an article of this sort, that's probably something you want to be careful of, since it leads to the idea that the article is essentially a "sour grapes" one. i.e. Professors gave you bad grades and so you want to blame it on them by saying they're the "bad" ones.
Indeed, there may be bad professors. But if you want to be taken seriously, you need to be exquisitely aware of subtext. Typos, in this case, subtextually argue against you.
Combined with the borderline offensive suggestion to avoid "nice" reviews, the over-simplification of the rules governing academic freedom, the offensive-if-not-illegal suggestion to record lectures and post such recordings without your professor's knowledge, and the completely mistaken idea that the university functions entirely within an economic model wherein the student is consumer and professors are selling a "product," the typos further indicate a lack of time and research and a general sense of immaturity.
Professors won't take you seriously with an article like this. As a professor myself, I can say this with some authority.
Thank you for your feedback, An Honors Writing Professor.
ReplyDeleteMy response got a little lengthy so you can find it here.